Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Wheee.. 2.1.108ac2 | Date | Wed, 08 Jul 1998 09:22:02 -0400 | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
Chris Wedgwood <chris@cybernet.co.nz> said: > On Tue, Jul 07, 1998 at 06:17:04AM -0500, Thomas Molina wrote: > > I thought the acX patches were serial (i.e. patch with ac1 then ac2, > > etc). Does this mean we should ignore 108ac1 and apply ac2 to a clean > > 2.1.108 source tree?
> ac1-ac2 is the diff. between ac2 and ac2 (obviously). ac2 (alone) is the > diff between the kernel tree and ac2. > > Both don't always exist, time constraints I guess.
In this case, 2.1.108-ac1 is broken (as a patch); 2.1.108-ac2 includes everything that was in there. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |