Messages in this thread | | | From | "LLORNKCOR" <> | Subject | Re: Is the boot logo politically correct? | Date | Mon, 27 Jul 1998 07:49:47 -0600 |
| |
Am I the only one that doesn't have any clue as to what, or where this so called boot logo is, or should be, or will be? Am I missing something here?
-----Original Message----- From: Rene Janssen <rjanssen@ns.oke.nl> To: alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu> Date: Monday, July 27, 1998 7:36 AM Subject: Re: Is the boot logo politically correct?
>At 08:23 AM 7/27/98 -0400, you wrote: >>Not possible, the /proc entry or the dev devices are not known before boot >>time. I am currently discussing with Geert a different scheme, more >>details when I have a clearer idea of what I need to do. >> > >A proposal : > >Stable releases get the normal penguin logo by default, the developers >releases have the beer drinking penguin logo by default (hint: to indicate >stability ;). Furthermore the bootlogo should be configurable through make >config and selectable through a kernel parameter if there's more than one >logo compiled in. > >Cheers! > > > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu >Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |