lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Is the boot logo politically correct?
Date
Am I the only one that doesn't have any clue as to what, or where this so
called boot logo is, or should be, or will be? Am I missing something here?

-----Original Message-----
From: Rene Janssen <rjanssen@ns.oke.nl>
To: alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu>
Date: Monday, July 27, 1998 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: Is the boot logo politically correct?


>At 08:23 AM 7/27/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>Not possible, the /proc entry or the dev devices are not known before boot
>>time. I am currently discussing with Geert a different scheme, more
>>details when I have a clearer idea of what I need to do.
>>
>
>A proposal :
>
>Stable releases get the normal penguin logo by default, the developers
>releases have the beer drinking penguin logo by default (hint: to indicate
>stability ;). Furthermore the bootlogo should be configurable through make
>config and selectable through a kernel parameter if there's more than one
>logo compiled in.
>
>Cheers!
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.037 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site