lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.1.111pre1 compile errors
On 23 Jul 1998, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:

> >>>>> "Jon" == Jon M Taylor <taylorj@ecs.csus.edu> writes:
>
> Jon> # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set
> Jon> CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=y
> Jon> # CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set
> Jon> CONFIG_VFAT_FS=y
>
> The problem is the missing CONFIG_FAT_FS. In linux/fs/Config.in,
> CONFIG_MSDOS_FS, CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS and CONFIG_VFAT_FS are all dependent
> on CONFIG_FAT_FS, so it should be impossible to choose them w/o also
> choosing CONFIG_FAT_FS.

Huh. It isn't, as you can see. Why is CONFIG_FAT_FS even a
separate option? Couldn't it be automatically made if any of the three
CONFIG_ targets that depend on it are selected? Is there any use to
having CONFIG_FAT_FS enabled without any of the others?

> Which fooconfig did you make(1)?

Menuconfig.

---
'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in
becoming one with God.'
- Scientist G. Richard Seed


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.058 / U:1.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site