Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Jul 1998 09:22:36 -0700 (PDT) | From | "Jon M. Taylor" <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.111pre1 compile errors |
| |
On 23 Jul 1998, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
> >>>>> "Jon" == Jon M Taylor <taylorj@ecs.csus.edu> writes: > > Jon> # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set > Jon> CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=y > Jon> # CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set > Jon> CONFIG_VFAT_FS=y > > The problem is the missing CONFIG_FAT_FS. In linux/fs/Config.in, > CONFIG_MSDOS_FS, CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS and CONFIG_VFAT_FS are all dependent > on CONFIG_FAT_FS, so it should be impossible to choose them w/o also > choosing CONFIG_FAT_FS.
Huh. It isn't, as you can see. Why is CONFIG_FAT_FS even a separate option? Couldn't it be automatically made if any of the three CONFIG_ targets that depend on it are selected? Is there any use to having CONFIG_FAT_FS enabled without any of the others?
> Which fooconfig did you make(1)?
Menuconfig.
--- 'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in becoming one with God.' - Scientist G. Richard Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |