Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 1998 04:56:43 +0200 (CEST) | | From | Winfried Truemper <> | | Subject | Re: secure levels? |
| |
> For most purposes, the new capabilities can emulate the old securelevel > by removing a certain capability from all processes on the system.
... if we had filesystem support. An interesting feature would be to have optional support for securelevels by a kernel-routine which does
for (every pid) { remove IMMUTABLE,... from pid } This could be even done by a module (?) upon some event. Please keep in mind I don't say I prefer securelevels, but to have them as an option is surely a plus.
-Winfried
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
|  |