lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 24 Jul 1998 04:56:43 +0200 (CEST)
FromWinfried Truemper <>
SubjectRe: secure levels?


> For most purposes, the new capabilities can emulate the old securelevel
> by removing a certain capability from all processes on the system.

... if we had filesystem support. An interesting feature would be to have
optional support for securelevels by a kernel-routine which does

for (every pid) { remove IMMUTABLE,... from pid }
This could be even done by a module (?) upon some event. Please keep in
mind I don't say I prefer securelevels, but to have them as an option is
surely a plus.


-Winfried



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2010