lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.1 kernel
I am sure that any one of the devel kernels are more stable than
windows OS !!!!! :)

Matthew D. Pitts wrote:
>
> It's up to you which kernel version you choose. As Forrest Gump might say,
> "Stable is as Stable stays."
> Matthew D. Pitts
> mpitts@suite.224.net
>
> > Well, I'm liking the 111-pre1 a lot. I like 110ac2, too. When in the
> > stable branch, just remember you should stay on top of the list ALL the
> > time, and just be aware you are running a devel kernel.
> >
> > >
> > > Hello everyone!
> > >
> > > Next week I am going to be setting up an PPro SMP machine. I was
> > > wondering if anyone could suggest a stable 2.1 series kernel since the
> SMP
> > > code is so much better.
> > >
> > > Here is the hardware configuration:
> > >
> > > 2 - Pentium Pro 200MHz with 512 L2
> > > i440FX chipset
> > > 256MB RAM
> > > 1 - 3Com 3C905 PCI 10/100Mbit NIC
> > > 1 DPT 3334UW/3 SCSI RAID controller
> > > #9 FX Motion 771 video card.
> > >
> > > Also, there are two EATA-DMA drivers. One is a PIO and the other is
> DMA.
> > > Which one should I use?
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.029 / U:1.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site