Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jul 1998 02:52:12 +0000 | From | llornkcor <> | Subject | Re: 2.1 kernel |
| |
I am sure that any one of the devel kernels are more stable than windows OS !!!!! :)
Matthew D. Pitts wrote: > > It's up to you which kernel version you choose. As Forrest Gump might say, > "Stable is as Stable stays." > Matthew D. Pitts > mpitts@suite.224.net > > > Well, I'm liking the 111-pre1 a lot. I like 110ac2, too. When in the > > stable branch, just remember you should stay on top of the list ALL the > > time, and just be aware you are running a devel kernel. > > > > > > > > Hello everyone! > > > > > > Next week I am going to be setting up an PPro SMP machine. I was > > > wondering if anyone could suggest a stable 2.1 series kernel since the > SMP > > > code is so much better. > > > > > > Here is the hardware configuration: > > > > > > 2 - Pentium Pro 200MHz with 512 L2 > > > i440FX chipset > > > 256MB RAM > > > 1 - 3Com 3C905 PCI 10/100Mbit NIC > > > 1 DPT 3334UW/3 SCSI RAID controller > > > #9 FX Motion 771 video card. > > > > > > Also, there are two EATA-DMA drivers. One is a PIO and the other is > DMA. > > > Which one should I use? > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |