lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel-bound applications?
On Thu, Jul 23, 1998 at 11:45:36AM -0700, Kirk Petersen wrote:
> > - direct copying from writing process to reading process. This would
> > require you to read the page tables of the reading process so you can
> > copy_from_user() to the physical pages of the reading process. You'll
> > need to pin down the reading process pages
>
> I was thinking about this method. For blocking reads and writes, it seems
> like it would work great. But since X uses non-blocking i/o, I didn't
> really look into it. Anyone want to comment further on the feasibility?

Do X clients typically use non-blocking I/O? I suspect that only the
server needs non-blocking I/O. If the clients block, this should be
enough to make it possible for you to do what you want (I think :-)


Jim

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Nance Avant! Corporation
(919) 941-6655 Do you have sweet iced tea? jim_nance@avanticorp.com
No, but theres sugar on the table.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.045 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site