lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Memory Rusting Effect [re: Linux hostile to poverty]
Date
From
In message <199807192246.SAA23379@jupiter.cs.uml.edu>, "Albert D. Cahalan" 
writ
es:
+-----
| Can't we increase system requirements with time? If not, then we
| must abide by the limits of the original PDP-7 hardware. That means
| we should be able to run Linux in 4096 18-bit words.
+--->8
Folks, increased functionality and/or increased performance almost always
means increased memory footprint. There's no fix for that yet, as long as
the kernel itself can't be swapped (and I don't think we want to deal with
the *nasty* potential deadlocks inherent in swappable kernel memory!).

The difference with respect to Windows is that there's hardly any additional
functionality or performance to justify the bloat....
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering
carnegie mellon university (bsa@kf8nh is still valid.)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.443 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site