lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Strange interrupt behaviour
On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:

> nice hack. If the 'current' issue is solved, this also enables us to

Thanks! Anyway I noticed now (this night was really too late) that
old_stacks can be removed since I can put the old stack pointer in the new
stack directly instead to push the irq that indexed old_stacks[].

It the patch make sense (there are a lot of things I am not aware I
think... for example I thought that the same interrupt couldn' t be
reentrant...) I can optimize it out this evening...

Also I' ve seen that the task state struct is saved in the last 0x1fff
bytes of the kernel stack but I thought that it doesn' t make sense the
tss inside an interrupt...

Andrea[s] Arcangeli



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.097 / U:1.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site