Messages in this thread | | | From | (Ganesh Sittampalam) | Subject | Re: 2.1.108 stress test results | Date | Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:29:14 GMT |
| |
On Wed, 15 Jul 1998 00:18:52 +0200, you wrote:
>> > > The 2.0.35 release notes let me do a slightly unscheduled stress test >> > > on the 2.1.108 code. >> > > >> > Maybe it's interesting for some people to post more details >> > of your stress tests, so people can do some tests on their hardware. >> >> Note the "slightly unscheduled". The 2 pages a second are the 2.0.35 release >> notes at http://roadrunner.swansea.linux.org.uk. It wasnt planned stress testing > >Ah, thanks for your quick reply. > >I thought you eventually had some ideas for a planned stress testing. >It's sometimes very difficult to test a new kernel on "low loaden >workstations". >The best test would be to put it on a production machine, but who knows what >happens. ;)
The one thing that is hard to do with development kernels is testing the effect of long uptimes. Is there any way to simulate this, perhaps by putting a machine under heavy load in some way?
Ganesh -- ganesh.sittampalam@magd.ox.ac.uk http://users.ox.ac.uk/~magd0688 Life is a terminal illness PGP Key 0xFDE02725 Fingerprint 4CD6 D38E 0CB3 A9F8 2308 7637 7A3C 0565
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |