Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linus Speaks About KDE-Bashing | Date | Sun, 12 Jul 1998 17:42:28 -0300 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
Seeing as how the KDE vs. GNOME thread apparently really *is* the most important thing ever to happen in the world of Linux and must be forced on everyone involved with it (now I remember why I left the Linux community. Thanks, folks.)....
In message <m0yvRUy-001D8bC@valiant.koehntopp.de>, Kristian Koehntopp writes: +----- | In netuse.lists.linux-kernel you write: | >If the interfaces | >standardize, end users will end up mixing GPL'ed and non-GPL'ed components | >all over the place. There are hints of this in the Windows world already | Actually, this is already happing today, whenever dynamic | linking is used to load a propietary application and load it on | a GPLed operating system or whenever a propietary operating | system loads GPLed code. +--->8
More than that. Quite a bit of GNU software is available on OS/2, and an ever-growing amount on Win32 platforms --- both of which access the actual OS (not just an interface library such as libc, mind you, but actual system calls) as one or more DLLs. (In OS/2 it's DOSCALL1.DLL.) Are all such ports illegal, then? If not, how does it differ from a Solaris distribution that ships with Motif --- much less a Linux distribution which ships with Qt?
Wake me up when everyone wakes up and starts working on Linux again --- don't bother if you all manage to drown the Open Source concept in a sea of recriminations.
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering carnegie mellon university (bsa@kf8nh is still valid.)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |