lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Strange interrupt behaviour
    On Sun, Jul 12, 1998 at 06:23:30PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > I certainly agree that we might have a 16-byte "default allocation" inside
    > the dentry, and have the name pointer point to that when it is enough.
    > That would work - waste some memory when there are names longer than 16
    > bytes, but those are rare, and it would save memory for the default case
    > by having just one allocation.
    >
    > Andi, do you want to look into this?

    My kernel already runs with this :), so expect a patch soon.

    I have just to verify that it does the right thing in the rename case.

    -Andi

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:9.454 / U:0.132 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site