Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Jun 1998 11:45:52 +1000 | From | Richard Gooch <> | Subject | Re: NODIRATIME...great work! |
| |
Shawn Leas writes: > > On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > Shawn Leas writes: > > > On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > > > > > mlord@pobox.com writes: > > > > > Perry Harrington wrote: > > > > > > > > > > .... glories of NODIRATIME ... > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, this was actually more noticable than the noatime patch. > > > > > > > > > > I missed the start of this. > > > > > > > > > > Did you patch the kernel, or is there a version of mount(8) > > > > > that supports "-o nodiratime" ?? > > > > > > > > Recent 2.1.x kernels have the MS_NODIRATIME kernel patch. mount-2.7k > > > > has the "nodiratime" mount(8) patch. > > > > > > I have mount 2.7l, and that does not allow nodiratime. Where might I find > > > that patch, or a copy of 2.7k? > > > > Add the following line to mount_constants.h for mount-2.7k: > > #define MS_NODIRATIME 2048 /* Do not update directory access times */ > > Thank you, i guess i had no insight into why the gaush darn thing wasn't > working. > > mount 2.7l works ok with this line added. Why is it now included by > default?
Oversight.
Regards,
Richard....
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |