lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Forcing Deallocation of Memory?
Date
> Now, is there a FEASABLE way that we could do forced deallocation by PID
> and/or memaddr in the kernel? By feasable, I mean it doesn't trash
> everything when it does it, and only forces the dealloc if the matching
> PID is dead. Because the way I *PREFER* to run X, I'll need to upgrade
> this box to the full 1G to keep X going. ;P

So throw away AccelX, buy an XFree supported controller and stop whining
on here about their user space problem ?

Alan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans