lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    DateFri, 5 Jun 1998 08:23:40 +0100 (BST)
    FromTigran Aivazian <>
    SubjectRe: Demo of patching syscalls from a module
    On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Richard Henderson wrote:
    > On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 07:58:54AM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
    > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS will export no symbols. I need DONTEXPORT_THIS_SYMBOL
    > > type of thing ;)
    > 
    > We explicitly do not support such a construct.  
    > 
    > First, know that if there are any symbols exported with EXPORT_SYMBOL,
    > there will be no implicitly exported symbols.  The implicit exporting
    > of symbols is a backward compatibility hook; new code should not use it.
    Yes, thank you. I realised that after Rogier Wolff's reply (is he Rogier
    or Roger, btw?). So, the rule is - if I have nothing to export use
    EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS, if I have at least one symbol to export - use
    EXPORT_SYMBOL(symbol) and then nothing else will be "auto"-exported.
    
    Thanks,
    ------
    Tigran A. Aivazian           | http://www.sco.com/
    Escalations Research Group   | Email: tigran@sco.com
    Santa Cruz Operation Ltd     | 
    
    
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    
    
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2008