![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 07:58:54AM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS will export no symbols. I need DONTEXPORT_THIS_SYMBOL > > type of thing ;) > > We explicitly do not support such a construct. > > First, know that if there are any symbols exported with EXPORT_SYMBOL, > there will be no implicitly exported symbols. The implicit exporting > of symbols is a backward compatibility hook; new code should not use it. Yes, thank you. I realised that after Rogier Wolff's reply (is he Rogier or Roger, btw?). So, the rule is - if I have nothing to export use EXPORT_NO_SYMBOLS, if I have at least one symbol to export - use EXPORT_SYMBOL(symbol) and then nothing else will be "auto"-exported. Thanks, ------ Tigran A. Aivazian | http://www.sco.com/ Escalations Research Group | Email: tigran@sco.com Santa Cruz Operation Ltd | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||