Messages in this thread | | | Date | 28 Jun 1998 20:23:35 +0200 | From | "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <> | Subject | Re: Thread implementations... |
| |
torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) writes:
>In short, it just sounds extremely silly to try to fight nagle with the >wrong kinds of interfaces when we can _control_ nagle instead. Nagle is
I don't want to control nagle in every application. I'm happy with the default setting and the ability to tack a header in front of a file and send it out via a simple syscall.
In other words: I like the HP approach to add an writev to sendfile()
Kind regards Henning
-- Dipl.-Inf. Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- hps@tanstaafl.de TANSTAAFL! Consulting - Unix, Internet, Security
Hutweide 15 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 "There ain't no such D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20 thing as a free Linux"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |