Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Jun 1998 18:21:10 -0400 | From | James Michael Mastros <> | Subject | Re: SACK in 2.0.x |
| |
On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 02:49:39 PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > no That probably deserves a bit more explanation: 2.0.x is a stable tree, meaning that new things aren't going to be added that aren't: a) _Absolutly_ neccessary b) _Certian_ not to break anything. Whether there is an "and" there or an "or" depends on who you ask.
2.2.0 should be hitting the wire before too long, so [insert your favorite 2.1.x feature here] will be in a stable kernel then.
-=- James Mastros -- True mastery is knowing enough to bullshit the rest. -=- Me This e-mail is licensed under the OP/L. See www.opencontent.org.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |