lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: SACK in 2.0.x
On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 02:49:39 PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> no
That probably deserves a bit more explanation: 2.0.x is a stable tree,
meaning that new things aren't going to be added that aren't:
a) _Absolutly_ neccessary
b) _Certian_ not to break anything.
Whether there is an "and" there or an "or" depends on who you ask.

2.2.0 should be hitting the wire before too long, so [insert your favorite
2.1.x feature here] will be in a stable kernel then.

-=- James Mastros
--
True mastery is knowing enough to bullshit the rest.
-=- Me
This e-mail is licensed under the OP/L. See www.opencontent.org.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.045 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site