[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Thread implementations...

    On 24 Jun 1998, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

    > >>>>> "RG" == Richard Gooch <Richard.Gooch@atnf.CSIRO.AU> writes:
    > RG> If we get madvise(2) right, we don't need sendfile(2), correct?
    > It looks like it from here. As far as madvise goes, I think we need
    > to implement madvise(2) as:

    ... note that mmap() requires a bunch of kernel structures set up to map
    things into the program's memory space... when in reality the program
    doesn't care at all about the bytes. (And then there's process address
    space limitations...) sendfile() and such don't have these problems, and
    it may be far more simple to implement sendfile() than it would be to put
    all the hints and such into the mm layer to get mmap() performance up to
    the same level.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.017 / U:5.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site