[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RT cache management [again offtopic]h
On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

>> You really can' t compare Debian with Red Hat about security. Debian is
>> very more secure. With my knowledge about exploit (reading daily BUGTRAQ
>> and weekly rootshell) I never been able to exploit my system that is
>> always uptodate with debian-changes HIGH-PRIORITY packages. Also Debian
>> provide a new mailing list only about security
>If you are using pine I'll send you an email to erase your home directory
>under debian if you want 8). A lot of people assume there is a material

I just checked that my pine is invulnerable. Do that please ;-).

>difference between security in Linux systems - its rarely the case. Red

It' s the case when a distribution don' t care about security and doesn' t
think twice before distribute a software suidroot.

>Hat people read debian lists, debian people read Red Hat lists and we
>bat patches back and forth (Debian has my nmh patches for example,
>Red Hat has debians mailx patches). Similarly the metamail patches to

This is nice and right ;-).

>stop the little pine feature will be appearing everywhere soon

andrea@penguin:~$ dpkg -l metamail
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
pn metamail <none> (no description available)

Andrea[s] Arcangeli

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.070 / U:2.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site