Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 1998 20:18:26 +0200 | | From | OLK <> | | Subject | Re: Release candidate for e2fsprogs-1.12 for testing (YES) | |
Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> positive reports
Here you get one
Comparing 1.10 against 1.12-WIP on my Kamikaze-System
Am5x86-133 oc. at 160 Mhz 2.1.102 libc5-based + AIC7xxx +
good old 0.5b ext2-fs
After smooth compiling and stabily fscking on >4GB Partitions,
there is to say that 1.12 is not a *bit* faster,
the only vermouth-drop is that it's much less peak-memory
consuming.
after Pass:3 2.178.816 Bytes (1.10) ./. 217.088 Bytes (1.12)
after finishing 1.908.480 Bytes (1.10) ./. 32.768 Bytes (1.12)
Well not bad, but any patch for transforming
saved-memory into gained-speed available ? ;-)))
Bye
OLK
--
eMail : delise@online-club.de
Linux - dat beste Textadventure wo gibt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
|  |