Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 1998 20:18:26 +0200 | From | OLK <> | Subject | Re: Release candidate for e2fsprogs-1.12 for testing (YES) |
| |
Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > positive reports Here you get one
Comparing 1.10 against 1.12-WIP on my Kamikaze-System Am5x86-133 oc. at 160 Mhz 2.1.102 libc5-based + AIC7xxx + good old 0.5b ext2-fs After smooth compiling and stabily fscking on >4GB Partitions, there is to say that 1.12 is not a *bit* faster, the only vermouth-drop is that it's much less peak-memory consuming.
after Pass:3 2.178.816 Bytes (1.10) ./. 217.088 Bytes (1.12) after finishing 1.908.480 Bytes (1.10) ./. 32.768 Bytes (1.12)
Well not bad, but any patch for transforming saved-memory into gained-speed available ? ;-)))
Bye OLK -- eMail : delise@online-club.de Linux - dat beste Textadventure wo gibt
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |