lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Off topic] Re: New Linux distribution - PSL
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Martin Konold wrote:
> > > would get samba and squid (okay, I'm biased ;p ), and a 'workstation'
> > > distribution may get some nice KDE stuff.
> >
> > Whoops you've just installed a couple of security holes unless you
> > have the right patches applied and exactly the right versions. And
> > nobody has even tried to audit KDE yet. You've also created a license
> > violating distribution so far ...
>
> Please stop spreading these lies.
[...lots of threats of legal action deleted...]

Wow. You can threaten people with lawyers. What you cannot apparently do
is tell people precisely what Alan is lying about:

a) That KDE has never had a formal (or even informal) security audit, and
recent BUGTRAQ traffic lends itself well to the need for such a
thing...

-or-

b) That KDE, due to licensing issues, could make life hard on those
building a distribution around it...

From where I sit (and frankly, I have no political or financial bias in
-any- direction), I think they're both very valid points. Care to address
them instead of providing thinly veiled threats of legal action?

And how the devil did this -ever- come up on linux-kernel anyway?

--
-------------------. emarshal at logic.net .---------------------------------
Edward S. Marshall `-----------------------' http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/
Linux labyrinth 2.1.105 #6 SMP Mon Jun 8 22:20:16 CDT 1998 i586 unknown
11:00pm up 8:06, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.065 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site