[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: FW: [OffTopic] Quick Opinion/Survey
    On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:

    > You should have set your reply address to
    > have made it easier.

    Probably should have.. but hindsight is always 20/20. :)

    > To answer your Q. No. I would not be interrested in buying such
    > things. Part of being a good BOFH is to install your own systems
    > - - down to the tiniest part. That way you know what breakes when
    > it breakes. E.g. if you never configure your sendmail, then you
    > will never know how to modify the configuration when you develop
    > other needs (such as anti-relaying etc). Also one oif the
    > advantages of Unix is the high degree of configurability. Not
    > two installations are the same.

    No argument there whatsoever. Professional BOFH myself. However, wouldn't
    you find it a HELL of a lot easier if you could buy 20 identical
    workstations, all identically configured? (hehe, dd the first's disk image
    to everything else;) In my experience, identical workstations with
    identical configurations are MUCH easier to troubleshoot, reinstall, and
    repair. You know EXACTLY what part you'll need, you have a CD with the
    disk image on it, and you know what it is if it shows up in another
    workstation. :)

    > On the other hand: the BOFH, who has to install many
    > workstations will quickly adopt an automatized scheme for doing
    > so (Sun have their "jumpstart" under Solaris, and similar
    > techniqies can be used on Linux).

    *nod* Why not plug-and-play workstations, with a Do It Yourself(tm;)
    server? Basically, you get all the workstations, identical, configured the
    way YOU want. And a workstation with NO OS, simply the hardware,
    bootdisks, and the Linux CD of your choice. :) You think you'd consider
    something like that? :)

    > Maybe "Mr. Private User" would benefit from a preinstalled,
    > preconfiguret machine with PPP/Fax/whatever set up and
    > applications like Applixware preinstalled. But for enterprises
    > and high-end, I think it's not worth it.

    Joe User would DEFINITELY benefit. I believe IS departments would benefit
    too, simply because it's easier to maintain 50 identical workstations than
    50 mishmash pieces and parts workstations (trust me; I've done it. And
    will never do it again.) If the IS Manager can get a whole solution,
    workstations and servers, that he needs only plug in, then why not? It
    would save countless man hours, and prevent MANY headaches for the guy
    who's not too clued. Or alternately, as I suggested above, for people like
    you and myself, the hardware, the disks, the CD for the servers, and the
    preconfigured workstations. I don't know about you, but I would MUCH
    rather buy my workstations preconfigured so I don't have to spend a few
    days setting them all up. ;)

    --Phillip R. Jaenke ( - InterNIC: PRJ5)
    Head Geek, Linux@Comdex Project -
    TheGuyInCharge(tm), Ketyra Designs, Inc.
    "For every step I take, I find somebody stepping on my heels."
    -- anonymous
    "That's IT! I'm gonna slap Dr.Watson with a malpractice suit!!" --Keihra
    ! I reserve the right to bill spammers for my time and disk space !

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.029 / U:29.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site