[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: mmap bug?
On 29 May 1998, Ben Pfaff wrote:

> It seems that attempts to mmap a region of size zero causes
> mmap to return zero. Is this a bug?
> Since it doesn't return -1, it looks like success, but of
> course dereferencing this NULL pointer causes a crash.
> Why would you dereference it if you didn't specify any memory? It
> seems to me that this is valid kernel behavior, and that the program
> has the bug.

The program, in this case, is glibc.

It is mmapping a file which it has been told by stat() is zero length.

I was just curious as to whether Unix98 or similar specifies any
behaviour; nowhere in the man page is the possibility of a zero return
from mmap mentioned. This is a free segfault out of many programs; of
course, as a NULL pointer dereference, it's not exactly dangerous.

FWIW, Solaris (x86 and Sparc) returns -1 and sets errno to EINVAL.
Digital Unix returns -1 and ENXIO.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.040 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site