[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: mmap bug?
    On 29 May 1998, Ben Pfaff wrote:

    > It seems that attempts to mmap a region of size zero causes
    > mmap to return zero. Is this a bug?
    > Since it doesn't return -1, it looks like success, but of
    > course dereferencing this NULL pointer causes a crash.
    > Why would you dereference it if you didn't specify any memory? It
    > seems to me that this is valid kernel behavior, and that the program
    > has the bug.

    The program, in this case, is glibc.

    It is mmapping a file which it has been told by stat() is zero length.

    I was just curious as to whether Unix98 or similar specifies any
    behaviour; nowhere in the man page is the possibility of a zero return
    from mmap mentioned. This is a free segfault out of many programs; of
    course, as a NULL pointer dereference, it's not exactly dangerous.

    FWIW, Solaris (x86 and Sparc) returns -1 and sets errno to EINVAL.
    Digital Unix returns -1 and ENXIO.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.018 / U:9.660 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site