Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: umount failure | Date | Fri, 22 May 1998 21:26:05 +0200 | From | David Woodhouse <> |
| |
sim@netnation.com said: > On Wed, 20 May 1998, David Woodhouse wrote: > > However, we might need to add a new syscall for it. umount(2) currently > > only takes a single argument: the name of the device/filesystem to be > > unmounted. > > It looks like somebody planned this: > > [sroot@blue:/root]# umount -f > umount: forced umount not supported yet
That's umount(8), not umount(2)
---- ---- ---- David Woodhouse, Robinson College, CB3 9AN, England. (+44) 0976 658355 Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk http://www.imladris.demon.co.uk finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk for PGP key.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |