lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 'C' Operators precedence
According to Richard B. Johnson:
> Look damnit..........

No, you look. No argument about language standards can never be
settled by examining any compiler's output. Ever.

The C standard specifies certain sequence points. Other than those
specific sequence points, order of evaluation is undefined. There is
nothing that says that in a+f(), that the value of a will be loaded
either before or after the call to f().

Now, state chapter and verse in the _standard_ if you disagree.
But please don't embarrass yourself by quoting gcc again.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@perlsupport.com>
"Gomez! I just invented the wheel!!" //MST3K

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.079 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site