[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectGGI ;o) (Was: Re: Boot Logo Thoughts (LONG))
    On Sat, 16 May 1998, Richard Gooch wrote:

    > > > On another note, why do we build gzip into kernel images when something
    > > > like bzip2 has come along?
    > >
    > > Oh, no!!! Not *this* flame-war again! Do we have to touch *every* old
    > > stomping-ground this week?
    > Looks like it :-( I'm surprised we haven't seen GGI start up again.

    Why? Whats wrong with GGI?????!?!?!!!?!?! ;o)

    I just downloaded the latest GGI snapshot, and it is cool! ;o)

    > This has been a very bad week, and it's been made that way by a bunch
    > of little boys sitting in the middle of their respective rooms and
    > yelping about some pet issue, and not giving up when Those Who Decide
    > (i.e. Those Who Write The Code[tm]) lay down the law.
    > Linux is not a democracy, it's a meritocracy. Deal with it.

    Linux is a linusocracy. ;o) Linus' hasn't made any horrible
    decisions yet, so I say we keep it this way.

    One exception: GGI. ;o)


    This message was not intended to start another GGI war, but it
    probably will. ;o) Sorry, I couldn't resist...

    What I'd like to see more than GGI in the kernel, is the GGI
    patches working by default with a modern kernel like 2.0.3[34].


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.021 / U:4.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site