Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 May 1998 19:09:31 -0700 (PDT) | From | "Aaron D. Turner" <> | Subject | RE: 2.0.33 -> 2.0.34preX patch fails |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I know it sounds rediculous, but here it is...
`head /usr/src/linux/Makefile`
VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 0 SUBLEVEL = 33
looks like 2.0.33 to me... and I didn't do any backouts, I deleted the old linux src dir, untarred the original, and patched away with the single pre14 patch.
On Fri, 15 May 1998, Dave Wreski wrote:
> > tar -zxvf linux-2.0.33.tar.gz > > patch <patch-2.0.34preX (where X is any patch rev.) > > > > short summary of failed patches: > > Verify you're actually patching a 2.0.33 kernel, as I've applied every one since > pre2, and never once had a problem with any of them. > > I have had a problem with backing them out to apply the next one, though. > > And don't you think someone would have noticed this problem by 14 patchlevels > now? > > Dave >
- ----- Aaron Turner | Either which way, one half dozen or another. aturner@pobox.com | Check out the RedHat Linux User's FAQ Online! www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/ All emails from this account are PGP signed. Lack of a signature is "bad". PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80 59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBNVz1XTM3jpXy1kJtAQEMLgP/U6gIomUmzjRxsFWZfW082qFmp7mc+i9M Ce9KIcKjmqA5ug3V7rx/V8Zd51EGBM7VKctL/oHIHJp3zb6uk6hzTE+Ls+dNSaxO MnuXIIscwRPY5nRnMFFODO2I1uUDo3J0ddnIhKmUIawKrQfjJbX6TLGPaE95fU85 4uacWHRwlQM= =qbpB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |