lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.1.102 and APM -- is the patch correct?
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 May 1998, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott,
> > I have a Laptop with APM. I removed the other #ifndef CONFIG_APM's and
> > the #endif's to get 2.1.102 to compile.
> > I then suspended and let it sit awhile, then did:
> > date ; hwclock
> > The two matched. (using apm-1.4)
>
> No, the relevant issue is whether you will get sporadic divide-by-zero
> oopsen in your logs after long periods of idle time with APM enabled.
> I don't think that 'date; hwclock' is a valid check.
>
> The correct solution is to replace the removed #ifdefs, not remove the
> others protecting you.
> --Scott
It's been sleeping 2.5h, none yet.
--
Garst

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:3.600 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site