Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 May 1998 15:29:28 -0300 | From | "Garst R. Reese" <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.102 and APM -- is the patch correct? |
| |
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> > Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 23:09:57 -0700 (PDT) > Subject: Re: 2.1.102 and APM -- is the patch correct?
> I can certainly put the APM workaround back, but I'd like to hear if > somebody actually has problems with this change before I do so.
> Linus
With the other ifndefs removed, I have been up 12h, suspended 2h + 6h. BUT, I do not use suspend to disk. Setting up StoD creates a hidden contiguous diskfile to save all of DRAM + some other system state stuff. It does (on my machine) effectively turn off the system. Indeed, to come back, I must cycle the power switch. The only diff. is that instead of booting on power-up, it restores the system to where I was. I have not even tried this under linux, and Scott has not been able to make it work. Maybe a CONFIG_APM_SUSPEND_TO_DISK to disable fasttimeofday would work. Scott --have you checked the size of you hidden suspend file to see if it is large enough? -- Garst
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |