lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectre: scheduling

> Perhaps we could have 3 levels of the "QNX scheduler" and run
> the normal timesharing scheduler within each of those. If there
> isn't a standard name for it already, I suggest "priority bands".

I have been working on a feedback multilevel scheduler with 40 levels to
make it easier to incorporate with the kernel and user utilities. I
haven't touched it for a while, but it was starting to work, but kept
running into problems remoing things from the run queue. I had ambitions
at one time of making it a tunable scheduler, but I'm still focusing on
stability for now. I can probably generate some patches against 2.0.33 if
there's interest.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Andrew Anderson http://amelia.db.erau.edu/~andrew/
if(!(family_tree=fork())){redneck=TRUE;}



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.654 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site