[lkml]   [1998]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Securelevel bitmap patch

Don't we want the granularity of the per-[user|process|thread]
capabilities mask to match the granularity of the per-resource permission
mask, whether it's all used in a particular context or not? (And by the
way, does one normally attach acls or other per-resource permission-mask
data structures to sockets, meaning there is a slot in a socket descriptor
for it? Or does this apply to ports only? Or neither?)

Regards, Clayton Weaver (Seattle)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.144 / U:6.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site