[lkml]   [1998]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Securelevel bitmap patch

    Don't we want the granularity of the per-[user|process|thread]
    capabilities mask to match the granularity of the per-resource permission
    mask, whether it's all used in a particular context or not? (And by the
    way, does one normally attach acls or other per-resource permission-mask
    data structures to sockets, meaning there is a slot in a socket descriptor
    for it? Or does this apply to ports only? Or neither?)

    Regards, Clayton Weaver (Seattle)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.048 / U:124.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site