Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Mar 1998 19:34:50 +0100 (CET) | From | MOLNAR Ingo <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.91 and 2.0.34-pre4 comparison |
| |
On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Samuli Kaski wrote:
> Insipired by compiler tests conducted here I did the same thing. The > used tree was 2.1.91. > > make dep; make clean; make zImage took on > > 2.0.34-pre4 10 min 36 sec > 2.1.91 9 min
> Nice, not mindblasting though, improvement I would say.
given that the compiler has not changed between those two compiles, and only 20-30% of the compilation time is 'spent' in the kernel, it is something like a 50% perceived kernel speed improvement ...
['spent' is the sum of "spent executing" and "spent waiting"]
-- mingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |