lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.1.91 and 2.0.34-pre4 comparison

On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Samuli Kaski wrote:

> Insipired by compiler tests conducted here I did the same thing. The
> used tree was 2.1.91.
>
> make dep; make clean; make zImage took on
>
> 2.0.34-pre4 10 min 36 sec
> 2.1.91 9 min

> Nice, not mindblasting though, improvement I would say.

given that the compiler has not changed between those two compiles, and
only 20-30% of the compilation time is 'spent' in the kernel, it is
something like a 50% perceived kernel speed improvement ...

['spent' is the sum of "spent executing" and "spent waiting"]

-- mingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.077 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site