[lkml]   [1998]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: unicode (char as abstract data type)
Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> There is also the backwards compatibility issue; how do you handle
> existing ext2 filesystems that are currently using ASCII, and a lot
> of existing code which assumes that the '/' and '\0' characters have
> special meaning. For that reason, the only thing which makes sense for
> the ext2 filesystem is to declare that filenames and volume labels are
> in UTF-8.

I agree with all that you say, but there is another issue for some
people: some file systems are being maintained by other operating
systems, so sometimes the underlying representation must vary from
file system to file system.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.500 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site