Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Apr 1998 11:15:46 +1000 | From | Dancer <> | Subject | Re: T/TCP: Syn and RST Cookies |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > > I know the current spec for T/TCP has a lot of opposition, but for > > research purposes, are there any more problems with it, besides SYN flood > > attacks and rlogin authentication problems? > > I was under the impression RFC1644 had unsolved duplicate transaction problems > too. > > Note: I don't know about Dave but I have no problem with T/TCP so long as its > not on by default and when not configured in has 0 clocks of impact on the > code. Oh and someone will maintain it *)
Agreed. But then, that's the basis we work under for most code.
D
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |