Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Status of SMp support in 2.1? | Date | Fri, 10 Apr 1998 13:17:53 +0200 | From | David Woodhouse <> |
| |
> Could somebody reply with a small update as to what the current > status of SMP support is in the 2.1 kernel tree?
Rock solid and gorgeous. This is on a dual-P200 Tyan Tomcat II with AHA2940UW and DEC 21041 (Tulip) network card.
> > I'm purchasing 4 dual Pentium-II servers my office and was hoping to > use linux on them. Is there anything I should know about that would > prevent one of the later 2.1.xx kernels for functioning well?
Not as far as I'm aware.
> > Are there any problems using the Intel EtherExpressPro 100 adapter > or the EATA-DMA SCSI driver under smp? Just wondering if the > network and DPT controller I ordered will have problems.
If in doubt, use the same hardware as Linus. See his definition of "regression testing". :)
Currently, I believe that's Intel SMP, EtherExpressPro, and BusLogic SCSI.
> > And lastly... I noticed the people are complainging of 2.9.9x locking > up. What would you suggest as to which 2.1.xx version to run that > will yield the most stability?
I foudn 2.1.8[789] to be good. I've only just updated fom .89 to .94, which seems fine here, too.
> dwmw2:/var/spool/mail $ uname -a > Linux dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk 2.1.94 #10 SMP Thu Apr 9 09:15:25 BST 1998 i586 unknown > dwmw2:/var/spool/mail $ uptime > 1:14pm up 1 day, 3:25, 2 users, load average: 2.07, 2.12, 2.33 > dwmw2:/var/spool/mail $ gcc -v > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/pgcc-2.90.27/specs > gcc version pgcc-2.90.27 980315 (egcs-1.0.2 release)
I'd get the latest - by the time you've ordered and installed the hardware, I'd expect any problems to have been fixed, even if you were destined to be one of the unlucky few who suffer.
---- ---- ---- David Woodhouse, Robinson College, CB3 9AN, England. (+44) 0976 658355 Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk http://www.imladris.demon.co.uk finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk for PGP key.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |