Messages in this thread |  | | | From | (Alan Cox) | | Subject | Re: mmap() versus read() | | Date | Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:52:56 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> So is this expected? Is there a knob I can twist? Is this just 2.0.32 > buffer problems and would be fixed by 2.0.33?
mmap doesnt do readahead on faults in 2.0.x, that increases the I/O load when paging mmap data versus read() quite a lot
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
|  |