Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: 2.0.34pre4 | Date | Thu, 26 Mar 1998 19:59:40 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> Hmmm.... That just stresses the need for somewhat better bug tracking > (this one was obvious, but I don't recall seeing it reported at all -- I > may just be absent minded). I've had to sit down and write a test suite
The Debian guys seem to have a good system, perhaps there are folks who want to do bug tracking work for the kernel in general ?
> Right now only one thread will be handling a page fault at a time, which > might severely hamper performance -- filling in a zero filled page will > block until a previous page-in request from disk completes.
I have to admit that for 2.0.x I couldnt care too much about improving performance. I do care that the Cyclone guys get their product working on Linux.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |