[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.0.34pre4
> Hmmm....  That just stresses the need for somewhat better bug tracking
> (this one was obvious, but I don't recall seeing it reported at all -- I
> may just be absent minded). I've had to sit down and write a test suite

The Debian guys seem to have a good system, perhaps there are folks who
want to do bug tracking work for the kernel in general ?

> Right now only one thread will be handling a page fault at a time, which
> might severely hamper performance -- filling in a zero filled page will
> block until a previous page-in request from disk completes.

I have to admit that for 2.0.x I couldnt care too much about improving
performance. I do care that the Cyclone guys get their product working on


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.047 / U:3.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site