[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.0.34pre4
    On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
    > Related question for the mm guys. In 2.0.x shouldnt the dup_mmap be
    > protected by a semaphore ?

    Yeap. I noticed the same bug is (was?) in 2.1 recently. Nobody must be
    doing lots of simultaneous mmap()ing and fork()ing with clones -- yet. ;-)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.016 / U:20.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site