[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.0.34pre4
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> Related question for the mm guys. In 2.0.x shouldnt the dup_mmap be
> protected by a semaphore ?

Yeap. I noticed the same bug is (was?) in 2.1 recently. Nobody must be
doing lots of simultaneous mmap()ing and fork()ing with clones -- yet. ;-)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.037 / U:10.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site