lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: patch for 2.1.90 net/core/iovec et al
Date
> So it seems to me that the best approach is to just not attempt to reset the
> sequence at all, but instead to regard the case of EFAULT during copy as an
> error that ate all the bytes. (Such errors will be extremely rare in any event.)

2.0.x preserves the read position when you get an EFAULT. Nothing I can find
in the holy manual of posix says what happens if you get an EFAULT on a tcp
operation, so I think we can do what we like.

Alan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.331 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site