[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectThe way Linux adds routes.
    As a result of a discussion on another group I ask this question....

    Why was Linux' route command written so strictly or explicitly? E.G. it
    seems that other OS's / routers allow something like:

    route add

    Which means route the 204.132.128 net with a gateway of the entire address.

    Or written in Linux route command -

    route add -net netmask gw

    The former being a shorthand method of defining the entire
    address,netmask,gw in one string.

    I am NOT arguing against the way it was done. Just wondering why it was
    designed that way.


    * Doug Crompton *
    * Richboro, PA 18954 *
    * 215-355-5307 *
    * *
    * *
    * *
    * *

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.017 / U:14.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site