Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 21 Mar 1998 08:14:27 -0800 | | From | "David S. Miller" <> | | | Subject | Re: 2.1.90 network layer again not responsive |
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 09:01:42 +0000 (GMT)
> Maybe acks for short (<mss) frames should be delayed _less_ than
> long (=mss) frames.
Well Dave appears to have his own magic formula now and it works
rather well in testing here. Who needs theory with a Dave Miller
around ;)
Don't jinx me, I'm trying to implement TCP FACK even when the other
end doesn't grok TCP SACK, only timestamps ;-)
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
|  |