lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From"Nicholas J. Leon" <>
DateMon, 9 Mar 1998 14:31:55 -0500 (EST)
SubjectRe: 2.1.89 broken?
On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Pavel Machek wrote:

 # Hi!
 # 
 # I would like to ask: Is 2.1.89 actually working for you? Mine will

Very nicely. Only up 1.5 days (that's when I upgraded), but on a
relatively stressed _personal_ box (couple o' quake2 servers, a couple rsa
contest crackers, runs some VERY large and disk i/o intensive perl apps [
>10MB resident data size], 1 raid0 fs, 3c509, HX based mobo, glibc).

___________________________________________________________________________
 simple is elegant         mrnick.binary9.net         nicholas@binary9.net
___________________________________________________________________________

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.332 / U:0.110 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans