Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 09 Mar 1998 14:07:47 -0500 (EST) | | From | Scott Lampert <> | | Subject | Re: 2.1.89 broken? |
| |
On 09-Mar-98 Myrdraal wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 1998 at 04:08:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi, >> I would like to ask: Is 2.1.89 actually working for you? > For what it's worth, it's working perfectly on my Cyrix 586/100. > -Myrdraal > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
It works for me on my 233MMX, however it seems to be far less efficient than prior kernels when it comes to memory handling. It doesn't seem to want to give up much memory from the disk cache, prefering to stick stuff in swap first. At least those are my observations watching the disk thrash with xosview running.
--- Scott Lampert | Home Page: http://www.heavymetal.org <fortunato@heavymetal.org> | PGP Key: finger fortunato@heavymetal.org "Black holes are where God +----------------------------------------- divided by zero."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
|  |