lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 10 Mar 1998 22:01:36 +0100 (CET)
FromMOLNAR Ingo <>
SubjectRe: [uPATCH] sched.c change; snappy_response++

On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > - /* .. and a slight advantage to the current process */
> > - if (p == prev)
> > + /* .. and a slight advantage to the current thread */
> > + if (p->mm == prev->mm)
> > weight += 1;
> > }
>
> But why remove the if (p == prev) test?
> It seems valid to me...

if p==prev then the p->mm==prev->mm condition will be always true ...

-- mingo



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2010