lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.1.89 broken?
From
Date
Scott Lampert <fortunato@heavymetal.org> writes:


> It works for me on my 233MMX, however it seems to be far
> less efficient than prior kernels when it comes to memory handling.
> It doesn't seem to want to give up much memory from the disk cache,
> prefering to stick stuff in swap first.

That is my experience as well... I've got 80 MB. It was happy with
about 56 MB for caches, 4 MB free and a little less than 20 MB
used. Oh - and 75 MB used swap.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
http://s9412a.steinan.ntnu.no/~teg/ ** teg@pvv.ntnu.no

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site