lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: 2.1.89 broken?
    From
    Date
    Scott Lampert <fortunato@heavymetal.org> writes:


    > It works for me on my 233MMX, however it seems to be far
    > less efficient than prior kernels when it comes to memory handling.
    > It doesn't seem to want to give up much memory from the disk cache,
    > prefering to stick stuff in swap first.

    That is my experience as well... I've got 80 MB. It was happy with
    about 56 MB for caches, 4 MB free and a little less than 20 MB
    used. Oh - and 75 MB used swap.

    --
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    http://s9412a.steinan.ntnu.no/~teg/ ** teg@pvv.ntnu.no

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.020 / U:29.532 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site