lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: umsdos/uvfat
Date
Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.3.96.980205191829.1205Q-100000@jennifer-unix.dyn.ml.org>
By author: James Mastros <root@jennifer-unix.dyn.ml.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> From the POV of DOS, vfat and fat are the same thing. DOS sees some
> illegal directory entries, and it ignores them. Most programs should do the
> same. The exceptions are programs that are designed to re-write entries
> (sorters and defragmenters, primarly), and those that are designed to test
> for bad entries. Anything else that dosn't ignore them is buggy.
>

Delete a file. Create a new file. Voila, the new file got the old
file's long filename...

vfat is a *much* worse hack than umsdos. Personally, I would suggest
ignoring this Micro$oft monstrosity as much as possible.

-hpa
--
PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/
"To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans