[lkml]   [1998]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: umsdos/uvfat
    Followup to:  <>
    By author: James Mastros <>
    In newsgroup:
    > From the POV of DOS, vfat and fat are the same thing. DOS sees some
    > illegal directory entries, and it ignores them. Most programs should do the
    > same. The exceptions are programs that are designed to re-write entries
    > (sorters and defragmenters, primarly), and those that are designed to test
    > for bad entries. Anything else that dosn't ignore them is buggy.

    Delete a file. Create a new file. Voila, the new file got the old
    file's long filename...

    vfat is a *much* worse hack than umsdos. Personally, I would suggest
    ignoring this Micro$oft monstrosity as much as possible.

    PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
    See for web page and full PGP public key
    I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see
    "To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.037 / U:24.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site