Messages in this thread |  | | | From | ketil@ii ... | | Subject | Re: GGI debate and etc. | | Date | 26 Feb 1998 11:09:50 +0100 |
| |
Bill Broadhurst <bbroad@CX492564-a.dt1.sdca.home.com> writes:
> Besides, the code is in the tree whether it's compiled or not. THAT's > to what I object.
Any reason you can't just rm(1) it? And use cvs to update your tree - last time I looked it wouldn't create new directories unless you told it to.
Perhaps it's time to make the kernel *source* more modular?
~kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
|  |