[lkml]   [1998]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: MILO vs BIOS on Linux/Intel.
On 14 Feb 1998, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Followup to: <>
> By author: James Mastros <>
> In newsgroup:
> >
> > Odd... I've never seen a multi-lingual BIOS, nor one that (recognizably) ran
> > (the setup) in graphics mode. Perhaps this is more common in Europe?
> >
> PS/1's did; also, some AMI BIOSes run the setup in pseudo-graphic mode
> (still text mode, but using a programmed font to make it appear
> graphical.)
> I'd rather wish they didn't; my experience has been that those BIOSes
> just make things a lot more painful.
That and make it look easy :/

Besides slowing me down those blasted thing make people think it's safe
to play with the settings.

Anyone want to fool with the refreash timings?

Gerhard Mack<>

As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.164 / U:0.996 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site