lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectX86 remote debug support??
Date
Has anybody done this? Is anybody working on it? Would anybody whose been
involved doing it for other architectures care to comment on the scope of
the job?

-evt

Eric van Tassell
Texel Software, Inc. - System Software Engineering for Windows/NT
277 Cochran Hill Rd. Voice : 603-487-5006
New Boston, NH 03070 USA Fax : 603-487-5166
email : evt@texelsoft.com
http://www.texelsoft.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> [mailto:owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu]On Behalf Of MOLNAR Ingo
> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 1998 8:01 AM
> To: Chris Evans
> Cc: Kurt Garloff; Linux kernel list; Linus Torvalds; Alan Cox
> Subject: Re: 960MB limitation for 2.2 ?
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> > Removing it seems silly. If users can't be trusted to get it right then
> > don't expose the settable option through the "make config" "make
> > menuconfig" etc. interfaces. But by all means leave the #define (heavily
> > commented of course) in a Makefile or include somewhere.
>
> actually, there was one more ugliness too: i was unable to pass parameters
> to the ld script properly, so ended up passing it via a temporary
> file ...
> (the 2.0 patch doesnt have this problem since we do not use lds scripts
> there.)
>
> -- mingo
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.162 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site