Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric Van Tassell 1) | Subject | X86 remote debug support?? | Date | Sat, 5 Dec 1998 21:44:25 -0500 |
| |
Has anybody done this? Is anybody working on it? Would anybody whose been involved doing it for other architectures care to comment on the scope of the job?
-evt
Eric van Tassell Texel Software, Inc. - System Software Engineering for Windows/NT 277 Cochran Hill Rd. Voice : 603-487-5006 New Boston, NH 03070 USA Fax : 603-487-5166 email : evt@texelsoft.com http://www.texelsoft.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > [mailto:owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu]On Behalf Of MOLNAR Ingo > Sent: Saturday, December 05, 1998 8:01 AM > To: Chris Evans > Cc: Kurt Garloff; Linux kernel list; Linus Torvalds; Alan Cox > Subject: Re: 960MB limitation for 2.2 ? > > > > On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Chris Evans wrote: > > > Removing it seems silly. If users can't be trusted to get it right then > > don't expose the settable option through the "make config" "make > > menuconfig" etc. interfaces. But by all means leave the #define (heavily > > commented of course) in a Makefile or include somewhere. > > actually, there was one more ugliness too: i was unable to pass parameters > to the ld script properly, so ended up passing it via a temporary > file ... > (the 2.0 patch doesnt have this problem since we do not use lds scripts > there.) > > -- mingo > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |