Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: smp_processor_id()? | Date | Sun, 06 Dec 1998 14:18:34 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <19981206033230.B21186@osiris.ml.org>, Brian Ristuccia writes: +----- | On Sat, Dec 05, 1998 at 04:28:10PM +1130, Paul Rusty Russell wrote: | > In message <19981203114846.L435@osiris.ml.org> you write: | > > It's very possible that this routine is getting wrong information. My lin | ux | > > box has two CPU's, but they're numbered 0 and 4 for some reason. I will | > > apply the patch this afternoon and try again. | > | > You mean that smp_processor_id() returns 0 and 4? | | Not exactly sure. Here's what /proc/cpuinfo has to say: | | processor : 0 > ( . . . ) | processor : 4 +--->8
FWIW my dual-CPU testbed machine at CMU does the same. It's dual PPro200 IIRC (it's running Solaris x86 at the moment so can't check).
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH Kiss my bits, Billy-boy.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |