[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Y2k compliance
    On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, S. Shore wrote:

    > In fact, the year 2000 isn't a leap year. A little-known rule of
    > leapyears (iirc) is that any year divisible by 100 (i think) can't
    > be a leapyear.

    Oww, I don't believe this!

    #define leapyear(year) (!(year % 4) && ((year % 100) || \
    !(year % 400)))

    I hope this matter is settled now, once and for all
    (well, until we need to define a new calender due to
    the earth's rotational speed slowing down).


    Rik -- the flu hits, the flu hits, the flu hits -- MORE
    | Linux memory management tour guide. |
    | Scouting Vries cubscout leader. |

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.038 / U:32.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site